<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sweet Surrender: My Conversion Story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://purifyyourbride.stblogs.com/conversion-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://purifyyourbride.stblogs.com</link>
	<description>Random Thoughts of a Catholic Convert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:48:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://purifyyourbride.stblogs.com/conversion-story/comment-page-1/#comment-1356</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://purifyyourbride.stblogs.com/conversion-story/#comment-1356</guid>
		<description>Happy Easter Purify!
Somehow I ended up on your webpage this morning.
I really enjoyed your story. God bless.
Jean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Easter Purify!<br />
Somehow I ended up on your webpage this morning.<br />
I really enjoyed your story. God bless.<br />
Jean
<div style='clear:both'></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quickbeam of fangorn</title>
		<link>http://purifyyourbride.stblogs.com/conversion-story/comment-page-1/#comment-1342</link>
		<dc:creator>quickbeam of fangorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 07:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://purifyyourbride.stblogs.com/conversion-story/#comment-1342</guid>
		<description>Well like many times on my journeys on the net, I have no idea how I got here, or what I was suppost to be searching for, but I found your story interesting. I use to frequent Renewing your mind discussion forum back in the 90&#039;s and had numerous discussions with the reform on what exactly the Catholic church believed. It amazed me how much individuals would insist on telling me what I believed rather then as a live long Catholic what I and the church taught and held to be true.

I agree with you on the inherent traditions that protestants have, but are unaware of. Having a baptist wife and baptist in-laws I always noticed that they start their &quot;spur of the moment&quot; prayer for grace with &quot;Dear Heavenly Father&quot; and end with &quot;in Jesus&#039; name we pray&quot;. Nothing wrong with that, just that they had developed a structured pray but thought it unstructured, because after all if it was structured it would be vain repetition -and we can&#039;t have that!

RCIA hit home as well, but given that it was the early to mid 90&#039;s I&#039;m not suprised about the lack of justification in the study. That&#039;s a product of the &quot;spirit of Vat II&quot; IMO. It&#039;s still not where it needs to be, but I think there&#039;s some improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well like many times on my journeys on the net, I have no idea how I got here, or what I was suppost to be searching for, but I found your story interesting. I use to frequent Renewing your mind discussion forum back in the 90&#8217;s and had numerous discussions with the reform on what exactly the Catholic church believed. It amazed me how much individuals would insist on telling me what I believed rather then as a live long Catholic what I and the church taught and held to be true.</p>
<p>I agree with you on the inherent traditions that protestants have, but are unaware of. Having a baptist wife and baptist in-laws I always noticed that they start their &#8220;spur of the moment&#8221; prayer for grace with &#8220;Dear Heavenly Father&#8221; and end with &#8220;in Jesus&#8217; name we pray&#8221;. Nothing wrong with that, just that they had developed a structured pray but thought it unstructured, because after all if it was structured it would be vain repetition -and we can&#8217;t have that!</p>
<p>RCIA hit home as well, but given that it was the early to mid 90&#8217;s I&#8217;m not suprised about the lack of justification in the study. That&#8217;s a product of the &#8220;spirit of Vat II&#8221; IMO. It&#8217;s still not where it needs to be, but I think there&#8217;s some improvement.
<div style='clear:both'></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alvina Lenerville</title>
		<link>http://purifyyourbride.stblogs.com/conversion-story/comment-page-1/#comment-1331</link>
		<dc:creator>Alvina Lenerville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://purifyyourbride.stblogs.com/conversion-story/#comment-1331</guid>
		<description>Purify,
I very much enjoyed reading your conversion story.  God bless you and your family.  AlvinaL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Purify,<br />
I very much enjoyed reading your conversion story.  God bless you and your family.  AlvinaL
<div style='clear:both'></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purifyyourbride</title>
		<link>http://purifyyourbride.stblogs.com/conversion-story/comment-page-1/#comment-912</link>
		<dc:creator>purifyyourbride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://purifyyourbride.stblogs.com/conversion-story/#comment-912</guid>
		<description>I had lost Albert&#039;s comment. I usually respond but I didn&#039;t that time. I responded to Peter and eventually figured out who he was. I can try and respond to him but I think the moment is lost. 

Albert&#039;s argument is common for anti-Catholics. It misunderstands the concept of development of doctrine. I think often deliberately so. A man obviously feels connected to the boy he was when he was 10. The fact that he has a beard and grey hair and, as a10 year old, he did not is just not relevant. They are the same person. Same thing with the church. It is the same body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had lost Albert&#8217;s comment. I usually respond but I didn&#8217;t that time. I responded to Peter and eventually figured out who he was. I can try and respond to him but I think the moment is lost. </p>
<p>Albert&#8217;s argument is common for anti-Catholics. It misunderstands the concept of development of doctrine. I think often deliberately so. A man obviously feels connected to the boy he was when he was 10. The fact that he has a beard and grey hair and, as a10 year old, he did not is just not relevant. They are the same person. Same thing with the church. It is the same body.
<div style='clear:both'></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stlazareth</title>
		<link>http://purifyyourbride.stblogs.com/conversion-story/comment-page-1/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>stlazareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://purifyyourbride.stblogs.com/conversion-story/#comment-907</guid>
		<description>sorry, I was right to err- John 20 verse 23.
Glad t have yo online</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry, I was right to err- John 20 verse 23.<br />
Glad t have yo online
<div style='clear:both'></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
